How we have changed the balance - Crowley
When
I ski the trails on our property I am always looking at the tracks. They change daily and with the snow
conditions. Many (too many) are made by deer, and there are plenty of squirrel
tracks and occasional feral cat prints, but what I am really looking for are
canine tracks. Not those made by dogs,
but by wolf, coyote or red fox. I think
I have seen one coyote track crossing through our woods in the last week and
possibly a fox track today, but they are rare sightings. I am sure there are occasional wolves in the
nearby CC Andrews State forest, but they have not ventured onto our property
that I know of.
We,
Americans of European descent, have a complicated and convoluted history with
canines. On the one hand we have a deep,
abiding love of our dogs, which are just domesticated wolves. But when it comes to the real thing and its
cousins there are many who react with one of two extreme opinions. They either adore the wolf to a nearly
supernatural level, or they hate it with a fanatical rage. The former often will choose to have a pet
that is a wolf/dog hybrid, in order to be closer to the animal of their
dreams. This is always a bad idea, since
wolf/dog hybrids are truly the canine version of Jeckyll and Hyde, creatures
who biologically do not know which they should be, often with disastrous
results for humans and the animals themselves.
Then
there are those who believe the only good wolf is a dead wolf. Some of this hatred stems from our European
ancestors who brought to this country their myths and real encounters with
wolves. Specifically, those experiences
of the Middle Ages when wolves, not surprisingly, feasted on the bodies not
buried during the Black Plague years. In
Europe, people lived in villages and the outlying land was used for farming and
grazing and here too the wolves competed with the people, earning them nothing
but contempt.
Here
in the U.S., the native people had an entirely different relationship with the
wild canines. Rather than villains,
these animals were teachers. The Native
Americans for the most part were hunter/gatherers and in the middle of the
country the millions of bison were enough food for man and beast alike. The wolves taught people hunting techniques
and for some tribes demonstrated examples of strong family relationships. This is not to say that these people did not
kill wolves on occasion. Their fur was used for clothing and in certain
ceremonial ways, but it was a limited harvest and not due to hatred of this
predator.
I
admire all the wild canids for their ability to adapt to changing conditions,
brought on by humans, and their ability to continue to flourish for the most
part, although wolves have been the least successful at surviving our efforts
to eliminate them from the landscape.
Minnesota and Alaska remain the only two states to boast a large number
of wolves (approximately 3000
here), and with few exceptions, all in the northern half of the state. We seem to have a begrudging acceptance to
their presence. Go west and you find the
same hostility towards wolves that has existed since the settlers moved
west. Thank goodness for Yellowstone
State Park, where wolves once again exist and have helped restore the native
vegetation by reducing the overabundant elk.
Coyotes have suffered reduction at the jaws of
the wolves in Yellowstone too, but this is a return to the normal
relationship. Where you have wolves, you
will find fewer coyotes and where you have coyotes, you will find fewer
foxes. It comes down to competition for
food again. It is well documented that
since wolves have been eliminated from much of the country, coyotes have
exploded in range and population. These
canids are so smart and adaptable that even after a century of poisoning,
shooting, trapping, and every other form of harassment possible, they continue
to live among us. According to the Minnesota DNR there are an estimated
40,000 coyotes spread throughout the state. Roughly 4000 are shot or trapped each year.
“Poor, out of luck and friendless” is the way Mark Twain defined the Coyote.
The
Minnesota DNR says the red fox is our most common predator. Though they don’t list any actual numbers,
they do say that hunters and trappers harvest up to 100,000 each year, and that
“the fox population remains strong.” We
used to see a beautiful red fox occasionally on our property and I believe it
had a den here too. By the number (ever
increasing it seems) of squirrels living nearby I have to believe that there is
no canine predator who regularly visits our land. Most recently we read an article that
documented research on Lyme disease that indicated fox have been a control
factor in the past and their absence may be leading to the spread of the so
called ‘deer tick’ which carries so many variations of this debilitating
disease. Red fox are superb hunters of
rodents. That is their main dietary
staple. Minnesota wildlife photographer
Michael Furtman has taken lots of photos of red fox hunting and spent countless
hours waiting and watching for action.
His observations have shown the red fox to be a bigger consumer of voles
than mice and that they are successful 8 out of 10 times when they strike. They will also cache food if they are being
especially successful. I for one would
be happy to have a resident fox to start cutting back on the rodent population
(mice in particular).
We
have changed our landscape dramatically over the past 100 years, in many ways
to our current benefit, but in other ways our ecosystem is out of balance when
it is missing critical components, including predators. Ultimately, we pay a
price for that disruption.
Comments
Post a Comment